Residents Demand Transparency in Sooke’s OCP Amendments

Sooke, British Columbia, is nearing the conclusion of a lengthy process to update its official community plan (OCP), a comprehensive framework that dictates community growth, environmental protection, and support for future generations. The initiative, which has spanned over six years and involved extensive input from thousands of residents, has now reached a pivotal moment as significant amendments have been made without adequate public consultation.

The initial draft of the updated OCP was crafted by a citizen-led committee following thorough community engagement. This draft encapsulated a diverse array of ideas and concerns from local residents. However, at a council meeting on March 28, 2022, major changes were implemented, raising alarms among community members. These amendments were introduced without prior notice or the opportunity for public input, leading to questions about the transparency of the process.

Several notable alterations have drawn particular scrutiny. One significant change involves the rezoning of the Mountain Heights subdivision (Lot 6, Plan VIP26066 – West Ridge Trails). The area, initially designated as Rural Residential by the citizens’ committee, has been transitioned to a higher-density Community Residential zone. This decision has sparked considerable opposition, with a petition against the change amassing over 2,500 signatures from concerned residents. This response highlights the strong public sentiment regarding the future development of the community.

Another controversial amendment pertains to the reduction of foreshore protection for oceanfront properties. The required buffer zone has been decreased from 30 metres to a mere 15 metres. This alteration contradicts established environmental science and fails to address the pressing realities of rising sea levels, as evidenced by local storm damage and shoreline erosion. While some property owners may benefit from this reduced buffer, the long-term implications for the community include increased insurance costs and greater vulnerability to climate-related damages.

These changes, rather than being minor technical adjustments, represent decisions that could have lasting impacts on the character and resilience of Sooke. As the community grapples with these developments, residents are urged to reflect critically on the following questions: Were these amendments made in the best interest of Sooke? Did they adhere to the spirit of transparency and public involvement that has characterized the OCP process thus far?

As Sooke moves forward with its OCP review, community members and stakeholders have a vital opportunity to voice their concerns and advocate for reconsideration of these amendments. The outcome of this process will undoubtedly shape the future of Sooke and its commitment to sustainable growth and environmental stewardship.