Connect with us

World

Chinese Defence Minister Calls for Trust with US Amid Taiwan Tensions

Editorial

Published

on

The defence ministers of China and the United States met in Malaysia on Friday, with China’s Minister of Defence, Dong Jun, emphasizing the need for “trust” to foster coexistence between the two nations. This dialogue took place on the sidelines of a Southeast Asian regional defence summit, just a day after a meeting between Presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump in South Korea. Although Taiwan was not a topic of their discussion, Dong expressed significant concerns regarding U.S. actions and statements related to the self-governing island.

During his conversation with U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Dong reiterated that the “unification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is an irresistible historical trend.” He urged the United States to exercise caution in its approach to Taiwan and to adopt a firm stance against any moves towards “Taiwan independence.” The Chinese government considers Taiwan a part of its territory, a position that has been a longstanding point of contention with Washington, which maintains official ties only with Beijing while supporting Taiwan’s self-defence capabilities.

In addition to discussing Taiwan, Dong highlighted the importance of both countries’ defence ministries taking “concrete actions” to implement the agreements reached by their respective heads of state. He called for enhanced policy-level dialogue to build trust and reduce uncertainty, aiming to establish a bilateral military relationship founded on principles of equality, respect, and peaceful coexistence.

Hegseth described the meeting in Kuala Lumpur as “good and constructive.” He emphasized the necessity of maintaining a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region and raised U.S. concerns regarding China’s activities in the South China Sea and around Taiwan. In a statement on social media platform X, he acknowledged the importance of addressing U.S. allies and partners in the region.

Earlier this year, Hegseth warned that China was “credibly preparing” to use military force to disrupt the regional balance of power, remarks that elicited a strong response from Beijing. At the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore in June, he stated, “The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.” This statement underscored the ongoing tensions surrounding China’s claims over almost the entirety of the South China Sea, which overlaps with claims from several neighbouring countries. The U.S. Navy has routinely conducted “freedom of navigation” operations in the area, further aggravating relations with Beijing.

Despite these tensions, Hegseth moderated his remarks during the recent meeting, stating that the “United States does not seek conflict” but will continue to defend its interests vigorously in the region. His diplomatic overtures included discussions with other officials at the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting, where he engaged with representatives from the 11-member bloc, including India’s Rajnath Singh. Hegseth and Singh signed a ten-year agreement aimed at deepening cooperation between their nations, which will see India acquiring U.S. military equipment such as patrol planes, missiles, and combat vehicles.

Hegseth concluded his engagements in Malaysia with plans to participate in a meeting with ASEAN defence chiefs, underscoring the significance of collaboration and dialogue in navigating the complexities of regional security dynamics.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.